The Jew Neocons that wrote the PNAC study, (Progress For a New
American Century) back in 1990, led by Cheney and his kinsmen,
Wolfowitz, Chertoff, Feith, Kristol, etc. listed a number or countries
that needed to be taken over. Many have fallen to our military, and Iran
remains as the next to fall, if they can get the U.S. to act. Today, they
have spent 5 billions (of U.S. taxpayer money) to upset the status quo in the Ukraine, and it
may just backfire on them. Paul Craig Roberts has it right.
JRN (Colonel, U.S Air Force Ret.)
February 15, 2014
In
a number of my articles I have explained that the Soviet Union served
as a constraint on U.S. power. The Soviet collapse unleashed the
neoconservative drive for U.S. world hegemony. Russia under Putin, China,
and Iran are the only constraints on the neoconservative agenda.
Russia’s
nuclear missiles and military technology make Russia the strongest
military obstacle to U.S. hegemony. To neutralize Russia, Washington broke
the Reagan-Gorbachev agreements and expanded NATO into former
constituent parts of the Soviet Empire and now intends to bring former
constituent parts of Russia herself–Georgia and Ukraine–into NATO.
Washington withdrew from the treaty that banned anti-ballistic missiles
and has established anti-ballistic missile bases on Russia’s frontier.
Washington changed its nuclear war doctrine to permit nuclear first
strike.
All of this is aimed at degrading Russia’s deterrent, thereby reducing the ability of Russia to resist Washington’s will.
The
Russian government (and also the government of Ukraine) foolishly
permitted large numbers of US funded NGOs to operate as Washington’s
agents under cover of “human rights organizations,” “building
democracy,” etc. The “pussy riot” event was an operation designed to put
Putin and Russia in a bad light. (The women were useful dupes.) The
Western media attacks on the Sochi Olympics are part of the ridiculing
and demonizing of Putin and Russia. Washington is determined that Putin
and Russia will not be permitted any appearance of success in any area,
whether diplomacy, sports, or human rights.
The American media is a Ministry of Propaganda for the government and the corporations and helps Washington paint Russia in bad colors. Stephen F. Cohen accurately describes US media coverage of Russia as a “tsunami of shamefully unprofessional and politically inflammatory articles.”http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article37635.htm
As
a holdover from the Cold War, the US media retains the image of a free
press that can be trusted. In truth, there is no free press in America
(except for Internet sites). See for example:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/02/12/us-press-freedom-index-2014_n_4773101.html During
the later years of the Clinton regime, the US government permitted 5
large conglomerates to concentrate the varied, dispersed and somewhat
independent media. The value of these large mega-companies depends on
their federal broadcast licenses. Therefore, the media dares not go
against the government on any important issue. In addition, the media
conglomerates are no longer run by journalists but by corporate
advertising executives and former government officials, with an eye not
on facts but on advertising revenues and access to government “sources.”
Washington is using the media to prepare the American people for confrontation with Russia and to influence Russians and other peoples in the world against Putin. Washington would love to see a weaker or more pliable Russian leader than Putin.
Many
Russians are gullible. Having experienced communist rule and the chaos
from collapse, they naively believe that America is the best place, the
example for the world, the “white hat” that can be trusted and believed.
This idiotic belief, which we see manifested in western Ukraine as the
US destabilizes the country in preparation for taking it over, is an
important weapon that the US uses to destabilize Russia.
Some Russians make apologies for Washington by explaining the anti-Russian rhetoric as simply a carryover from old stereotypes from the Cold War. “Old stereotypes” is a red herring, a misleading distraction. Washington is gunning for Russia. Russia is under attack, and if Russians do not realize this, they are history.
Many
Russians are asleep at the switch, but the Izborsk Club is trying to
wake them up. In an article (February 12) in the Russian weekly Zavtra,
strategic and military experts warned that the Western use of protests
to overturn the decision of the Ukraine government not to join the
European Union had produced a situation in which a coup by fascist
elements was a possibility. Such a coup would result in a fratricidal
war in Ukraine and would constitute a serious “strategic threat to the
Russian Federation.”
The experts concluded that should such a coup succeed, the consequences for Russia would be:
— Loss of Sevastopol as the base of the
Russian Federation’s Black Sea Fleet;
— Purges of Russians in eastern and southern Ukraine, producing a flood of refugees;
— Loss of manufacturing capacities in Kiev, Dnepropetrovsk, Kharkov where contract work is done for the Russian military;
— Suppression of the Russian speaking population by forcible Ukrainianization;
—
The establishment of US and NATO military bases in Ukraine, including
in Crimea and the establishment of training centers for terrorists who
would be set upon the Caucasus, the Volga Basin, and perhaps Siberia.
— Spread of the orchestrated Kiev protests into non-Russian ethnicities in cities of the Russian Federation.
The
Russian strategists conclude that they “consider the situation taking
shape in Ukraine to be catastrophic for the future of Russia.”
What
is to be done? Here the strategic experts, who have correctly analyzed
the situation, fall down. They call for a national media campaign to
expose the nature of the takeover that is underway and for the
government of the Russian Federation to invoke the Budapest Memorandum
of 1994 in order to convene a conference of representatives of the
governments of Russia, Ukraine, the USA, and Great Britain to deal with
the threats to the Ukraine. In the event that the Budapest Memorandum
governing the sovereignty of Ukraine is set aside by one or more of the
parties, the experts propose that the Russian government, using the
precedent of the Kennedy-Khrushchev negotiations that settled the 1962
Cuban Missile Crisis, negotiate directly with Washington a settlement of
the developing crisis in Ukraine.
This is a pipe dream. The experts are indulging in self-deception. Washington is the perpetrator of the crisis in Ukraine and intends to take over Ukraine for the precise reasons that the experts list. It is a perfect plan for destabilizing Russia and for negating Putin’s successful diplomacy in preventing US military attack on Syria and Iran.
Essentially,
if Washington succeeds in Ukraine, Russia would be eliminated as a
constraint on US world hegemony, Only China would remain.
I
suspected that Ukraine would come to a boiling point when Putin and
Russia were preoccupied with the Sochi Olympics, leaving Russia
unprepared. There is little doubt that Russia is faced with a major
strategic threat. What are Russia’s real options? Certainly the options
do not include any good will from Washington.
Possibly,
Russia could operate from the American script. If Russia has drones,
Russia could use drones like Washington does and use them to assassinate
the leaders of the Washington-sponsored protests. Or Russia could send
in Special Forces teams to eliminate the agents who are operating
against Russia. If the EU continues to support the destabilization of
Ukraine, Russia could cut off oil and gas supplies to Washington’s
European puppet states.
Alternatively, the Russian Army could occupy western Ukraine while arrangements are made to partition Ukraine, which until recently was part of Russia for 200 years. It is certain that the majority of residents in eastern Ukraine prefer Russia to the EU. It is even possible that the brainwashed elements in the western half might stop foaming at the mouth long enough to comprehend that being in US/EU hands means being looted as per Latvia and Greece.
I
am outlining the least dangerous outcomes of the crisis that Washington
and its stupid European puppet states have created, not making
recommendations to Russia. The worst outcome is a dangerous war. If the
Russians sit on their hands, the situation will become unbearable for
them. As Ukraine moves toward NATO membership and suppression of the
Russian population, the Russian government will have to attack Ukraine
and overthrown the foreign regime or surrender to the Americans. The
likely outcome of the audacious strategic threat with which Washington
is confronting Russia would be nuclear war.
The
neoconservative Victoria Nuland (fu#k the E.U.) sits in her State Department office
happily choosing the members of the next Ukrainian government. Is this
US official oblivious to the risk that Washington’s meddling in the
internal affairs of Ukraine and Russia could be triggering nuclear war?
Are President Obama and Congress aware that there is an Assistant
Secretary of State who is provoking armageddon?
Insouciant
Americans are paying no attention and have no idea that a handful of
neoconservative ideologues are pushing the world toward destruction.
NOTE:
I have received an email from Moldova, a country bordered by Romania
and Ukraine with cities on the Moldova-Ukraine border, that Moldovans
are paid 30 euros per day to pose as Ukrainian protesters. I would like
to hear from readers who can confirm this report and/or provide a media
source in support of this claim.