A Military Coup Will Remove Obama?
August 12, 2013
President Obama’s presidency has a
definitive shelf life. His backpedaling in the Middle East is of major
concern to the military establishment but also to special interest
groups such as the Carlyle Group. Obama is threatening to let Iraq and
Afghanistan follow in the footsteps of Vietnam. Further, Obama’s refusal
to attack Syria and Iran threatens the viability of the Petrodollar.
This two part series will examine the forces which are lining up against
this President and how five simultaneous political scandals are being held over his head to gain compliance from several powerful special interest groups.
The Aftermath of Benghazi
Obama’s presidency may not survive until 2016. He has the most dramatic set of political scandals in the history of the Oval Office.
The only question remaining for this president is will he leave office
as a result of the scandals or the result of a direct military coup?
Obama has already survived one military coup attempt, but it is difficult to believe that there aren’t more military coups waiting in the wings for the right moment to strike.
The First Military Coup
In the fall of 2012, it is now clear
that President Obama survived an attempted military coup. My sources
tell me, that Obama, is fully aware of the fact that key elements of the
military want him gone as the President and, in response, Obama has
secretly embedded his CIA operatives in various military command
structures around the world by placing these operatives into executive
command positions in order to
help them prevent just such a military coup and these embedded forces
have indeed served him well in the aftermath of Benghazi.
Often, these embedded operatives serve
as the second-in-command. The sole purpose of Obama’s operatives is to
keep watch on key military leaders and to prevent them from moving
against the policies of the present administration.
The murder of Ambassador Chris Stevens and his security detail at Benghazi served as a flashpoint for an attempted military coup. What is interesting about the coup attempt,
is that very divergent military forces have joined together to take
down Obama’s presidency. At issue was the attempted rescue of Ambassador
Stevens by two senior military command officers.
Can you imagine the reaction of Stevens, his security team, and two senior command officers if Stevens had indeed been rescued? The gun-running
stories of the CIA to Al-Qaeda would have turned the general populace
on its ear. This would have been Obama’s Watergate moment. Of course, Stevens had to be murdered to cover up Obama’s complicity in gun-running
to Al-Qaeda.
Remember, it was Hillary Clinton, on behalf of Obama, who
refused to beef up security for Ambassador Stevens at his request. With
all that the Benghazi event represents, the sheep of America would’ve
been awakened if Stevens had survived to talk. With the inability of the
Obama administration
to squelch the cries of conspiracy in the aftermath of Benghazi,
Hillary, in an effort to preserve her 2016 election hopes, could not
jump off the Obama ship fast enough. And even Napolitano has jumped ship
and look for more defections in the weeks ahead. Obama is in real
trouble. Spying on reporters and using the IRS to harass political
enemies is damning, but Benghazi is career ending.
A Review of Benghazi
Let’s review what we have learned about
what transpired at Benghazi. The Benghazi consulate, which was no more
than a CIA safe house, came under attack by Al Qaeda forces and the
attack lasted several hours. We now know that CIA forces were right down
the street at the time of the attack that murdered Stevens Al Qaeda
attackers, as they attempted to flee the murder scene, were subsequently
murdered by the CIA forces, who could have been used to rescue Stevens.
This was a desperate attempt to conceal Obama’s gun running operations.
We also know that several key personnel at Benghazi have been forced to
sign nondisclosure agreements about what they know. What did they know?
The Truth Is Hiding In Plain Sight
What is known, and what was reported in the New York Times, is that this administration ran guns to Al Qaeda in a Middle East version of fast and furious.
We’ve also learned that Ambassador Stevens was the conduit between the
establishment and Al Qaeda receiving weapons, which they used to
overthrow the Libyan government.
The murder of Stevens and his team at
Benghazi is a seminal moment in American history. We have further
learned that al-Qaeda forces, fighting on the side of NATO in Libya, obtained 20,000 hand-held stinger missiles. This means that the Obama administration
has allowed al-Qaeda to be armed to the teeth including the acquisition
of 20,000 stinger missiles in which only one is needed to take down an
American airliner. To cover their tracks, the Obama administration left
Chris Stevens and his bodyguards defenseless as they were killed by the
very terrorists who this administration armed. Can you imagine how the
election of 2012 would’ve turned if the American public had this
information. This is why Stevens had to be killed, but there’s more.
Obama Arming Al-Qaeda In Syria
It is now common knowledge that this administration was also running guns to Al Qaeda in an attempt
to overthrow Assad of Syria. However, news of their gunrunning was
beginning to leak and the source of the gunrunning had to be eliminated.
That source was Ambassador Chris Stevens and the sensitive information that he held, unfortunately for Stevens, came only a couple of months prior to the 2012 presidential election.
It is quite apparent that this administration felt that the evidence of
their gunrunning trail must be totally obliterated and the only way to
accomplish that was to arm Al Qaeda forces to assassinate Ambassador
Stevens. These are not shocking revelations, and I believe it’s likely
that Congress knew the truth as far back as December of 2012. However,
the congressional investigation did not succeed in their attempts at
getting to the bottom of the Stevens murder.
For more than a month
Hillary Clinton refused to show
up and testify.
Other establishment figures were less than cooperative
with regard to the congressional investigation. However, there is a
clear and distinctive pattern of high command military awareness of this
establishment’s murderous and treacherous actions which culminated in
the death, the preventable death of Stevens and his bodyguard
contingency.
The Middle East command structure of the American military was not on board with President Obama, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
and Defense Secretary Leon Panetta. Panetta is so unpopular with the
troops, that when he visits Afghanistan, the troops must be disarmed
prior to his landing because he has been fired upon before from American
ground forces.
In the aftermath of the Benghazi massacre, two senior
level command officers, General Carter Ham, the former commander of
AFRICOM and Admiral Charles M. Gayouette were removed from the command positions
and arrested by their executive officers. Do you remember that I
previously said that Obama was embedding CIA operatives into the number
two command positions in key military commands around the world? When
Hamm was in the process of launching a rescue mission to save Stevens,
General Rodriguez promptly arrested Hamm and assumed his position as the
head of AFRICOM.
Before we get into why Hamm and Gayoutte
were sacked on the same day, please allow me to first say that Obama’s
action of sacking two high ranking officers is so unprecedented, so
reckless, that it is difficult to comprehend. Please allow me to offer a
sports analogy in order to explain the magnitude of this action. Imagine that your favorite football team was on the eve of playing in the Super Bowl and the owner of your team fired both the head coach and the quarterback the night before the big game. Wouldn’t this throw your team into a state of disarray? Of course
it would, and subsequently your team would face annihilation. This is
exactly the case with our forces in the Middle East after the firing of
these two military leaders at this critical point in time.
The deposing
and subsequent arrest of the AFRICOM commanding officer, and the firing
of a Carrier task force commander was an irresponsible move by the Obama
administration and left a dangerous leadership void in the Middle East
that has needlessly put the lives of our military at risk. And it is
important to note that these firings took place at a time when it
appeared that war with Iran, Syria, China and Russia was on the
immediate horizon.
The positions held by Hamm and Gayouette
are so powerful and so sensitive, that their replacements require
approval from the Senate. Why would Obama engage in such a reckless act
when the country was so close to war? Very simply, both men were jointly
attempting to rescue Ambassador Stevens and his bodyguards, despite
being told to stand down by Defense Secretary, Leon Panetta who was
acting under Obama’s orders.
As Stevens was begging for help after
the attack had begun, General Hamm had activated a special forces team
within minutes of learning that the embassy, which was really a CIA safe house,
was under attack. When General Ham received his “stand down” orders
from Obama, he still continued with his plans to go ahead with the
rescue and was arrested within minutes of contravening the order by his
second in command, General Rodriquez. Admiral Gayouette, the commander
of Carrier Strike Group Three, was preparing to provide intelligence and
air cover for General Hamm’s rescue in violation of his standing orders
and he was promptly relieved of command for allegations of inappropriate leadership judgment.”
What is so significant about the sacking of these two military officers
is that they were from two completely different command structures in
two different branches of the military. This speaks clearly to an
overall military mindset with regard to how they view Obama.
It is abundantly clear that had Obama been concerned
for saving the lives of the four murdered Americans. American forces
could have stopped the mortar fire that eventually killed Ambassador
Stevens. However, Panetta and Obama blocked any rescue attempt. In legal
parlance, Obama, Panetta and Clinton are, at minimum, accomplices to
murder.
At maximum these three rogue government officials
are co-conspirators to first degree murder and now they have sacked two
senior command military leaders to cover their complicity in an act of
treason. I feel like I am watching an episode of the former popular
television show, '24', as we are presently engaged in a plot that
scarcely anyone would have believed if it had aired on television and
not occurred in real life.
Others Have Taken Note and Spoken Out
Even though the corporate controlled media refuses to provide detailed coverage of the events in Benghazi, Representative Buck McKeon
wrote a letter to Obama in which he boldly stated;
”As we are painfully
aware, despite the fact that the military had resources in the area,
the military did not deploy any assets to secure U.S. personnel in
Benghazi during the hours the consulate and the annex were under attack.
I find it implausible that the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff,
the Commander of U.S. Africa Command (author’s note: General Hamm) and
the Commander of U.S. European Command would have ignored a direct order from the Commander in Chief.”
There is also proof that Obama was warned in advance of the coming attack in which Stevens begged for more protection and his impassioned plea was denied by Clinton.
There’s further evidence that U.S. agents
in Libya were at least aware of weapons and militants moving across the
border. The ties between murdered U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and
jihadist Syrian rebels are becoming more clear as it is now known that Chris Stevens was an arms dealer for the CIA
and brokered arms deals with Al-Qaeda and their affiliate rebels in
both Libya and Syria. Can anyone imagine the political fallout to this
President if word of this had ever leaked out?
Stevens was the link
between the CIA and Al-Qaeda. With Stevens out of the way, the trail
could grow cold and the American public would be none the wiser. This is
why a rescue attempt was not permitted, and this explains why two senior
level officials were sacked for trying to do so. However, it is
becoming increasingly clear this mutiny represents a military mindset
and has the backing of the Carlyle Group. This connection will be
explored in part two.
Obama’s Tumultuous Relationship with the Military
General Ham had been in command of the initial 2011 US-NATO military intervention
in Libya. And as we can in part, read from US military insider
accounts of this growing internal conflict between the White House and
US Military leaders. The first sign of a major rift between the
American military and Obama became evident when the Supreme Commander in
Afghanistan, General Stanley McChrystal, was fired by Obama for
derogatory comments made by the General about the president.
Interestingly, the reporter who published a story which led to
McChrystal’s firing was none other than recently murdered reporter
Michael Hastings.
First McChrystal, then Hamm and Gayoutte
were fired by Obama. There appears to be a growing body of evidence
that the military is becoming more emboldened in their rebellion against
this rogue President.
CIA Director David Patraeus Is Sacked
Patraeus was the former commander in
Iraq and in Afghanistan after McChrystal was fired by Obama. He was
rewarded when he was appointed to be the CIA director. An extramarital
affair with Paula Broadwell brought down his reign as CIA director in
November of 2012, just following the election.
There is the reason given to explain an
event and there is the real reason behind the event. Sixty percent of
all married men cheat on their spouses. The more money they make and the
more power a man possesses, the more opportunity for cheating.
I have swamp land for sale in Florida
for anyone to purchase if they are naive enough to believe that David
Petraeus, former director of the Central Intelligence Agency
(CIA), resigned solely based upon having an extramarital affair with
the biographer-turned-mistress, Paula Broadwell. How did the affair
compromise Petraeus’ position as CIA director? The FBI, who vetted
Patraeus for the CIA director position, concluded that it did not.
Within two months after the Benghazi attack, four senior U.S. military officers were purged by Obama:
- Gen. Hamm, on October 18, 2012.
- Adm. Gayouette, on October 18, 2012.
- Gen. Petraeus, on November 9, 2012.
- General Allen, on November 13, 2012.
Other casualties of military leadership
during this time frame includes General Keene and General Odierno.
Further, the second in commander of Central Command, General Mattis, And
who could forget about General Mckiernan? In total, Obama has sacked
nearly 20 generals during his tenure as president.
Conclusion
Not wanting the Middle East to become
America’s next Vietnam, the military wants Obama gone. And now the
military has a strong partner, the Carlyle Group whose connections
ripple through the American power structure. These connections and the
other reasons why the Obama administration may not be standing by the
end of year will be presented in part two.
