This most important article may be a little long but I strongly suggest that you read the entire content, and then share it with as many people as you can, no matter where they reside. In essence, the national press of Malaysia is charging and blaming the Keiv government of Ukraine of shooting down flight MH 17. This is of gigantic importance. Period!!
Dr. James P. Wickstrom
Malaysian Press Charges The U.S. And Ukraine Government Shot Down MH 17
By Alex Lantier - 9 August 2014
A Thursday article in the New Straits Times, Malaysia’s flagship English-language newspaper, charged the US- and European-backed Ukrainian regime in Kiev with shooting down Malaysian Airlines flight MH 17 in east Ukraine last month. Given the tightly controlled character of the Malaysian media, it appears that the accusation that Kiev shot down MH17 has the imprimatur of the Malaysian state.
The
U.S. and European media have buried this remarkable report, which refutes
the wave of allegations planted by the CIA in international media
claiming that Russian president Vladimir Putin was responsible for the
destruction of MH17, without presenting any evidence to back up this
charge.
The New Straits Times article,
titled “US analysts conclude MH17 downed by aircraft,” lays out
evidence that Ukrainian fighter aircraft attacked the jetliner with
first a missile, then with bursts of 30-millimeter machine gun fire from
both sides of MH17. The Russian army has already presented detailed
radar and satellite data showing a Ukrainian Sukhoi-25 fighter jet
tailing MH17 shortly before the jetliner crashed. The Kiev regime denied
that its fighters were airborne in the area, however.
The New Straits Times article
began, “Intelligence analysts in the United States have already
concluded that Malaysia flight MH17 was shot down by an air-to-air
missile, and that the Ukrainian government had had something to do with
it. This corroborates an emerging theory postulated by local
investigators that the Boeing 777-200 was crippled by an air-to-air
missile and finished off with cannon fire from a jet that had been
shadowing it as it plummeted to earth.”
It
cited “experts who had said that the photographs of the blast
fragmentation patterns on the fuselage of the airliner showed two
distinct shapes—the shredding pattern associated with a warhead packed
with ‘flechettes,’ and the more uniform, round-type penetration holes
consistent with that of cannon rounds.”
The New Straits Times cited
several sources to substantiate its position. One was testimony by a
Canadian-Ukrainian monitor for the Organization for Security and
Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), Michael Bociurkiw—one of the first
investigators to arrive at the crash site. Speaking to the Canadian
Broadcasting Corporation on July 29, Bociurkiw said: “There have been
two or three pieces of fuselage that have been really pockmarked with
what almost looks like machine gun fire; very, very strong machine gun
fire.”
Another
source the paper cited was an article, “Flight 17 Shoot-Down Scenario
Shifts,” by former Associated Press reporter Robert Parry, who now
writes for the ConsortiumNews.com web
site. Given the lack of any evidence supporting U.S. charges that
pro-Russian forces shot MH17 down with a Buk anti-aircraft missile,
Parry said, “some US intelligence analysts have concluded that the
rebels and Russia were likely not at fault, and that it appears
Ukrainian government forces were to blame, according to a source briefed
on these findings.”
Perry
indicated that sections of the U.S. intelligence apparatus have concluded
that US secretary of state John Kerry’s claims that pro-Russian forces
shot down the plane are lies.
“Only
three days after the crash, Secretary of State Kerry did the rounds of
the Sunday talk shows making what he deemed an ‘extraordinary
circumstantial’ case supposedly proving that the rebels carried out the
shoot-down with missiles provided by Russia. He acknowledged that the US
government was ‘not drawing the final conclusion here, but there is a
lot that points at the need for Russia to be responsible,’ ” Perry
wrote. “By then, I was already being told that the US intelligence
community lacked any satellite imagery supporting Kerry’s allegations,
and that the only Buk missile system in that part of Ukraine appeared to
be under the control of the Ukrainian military.”
Finally, the New Straits Times and
Parry both cited retired Lufthansa pilot Peter Haisenko, who has
pointed to photographic evidence of MH17 wreckage suggesting that
cockpit panels were raked with heavy machine gun fire from both the port
and starboard sides. “Nobody before Haisenko had noticed that the
projectiles had ripped through the panel from both its left side and its
right side. This is what rules out any ground-fired missile,” Parry
wrote.
The New Straits Times report
constitutes a powerful accusation not only against the Ukrainian
government, but against Washington, Berlin, and their European allies.
They installed the Kiev regime through a fascist-led putsch in February.
They then deployed a series of intelligence operatives and Blackwater
mercenaries who are closely coordinating the various fascist militias
and National Guard units fighting for Kiev on the ground in east
Ukraine, where MH17 was shot down.
These
forces now stand accused not only of stoking an explosive political and
military confrontation with Russia on its border with Ukraine over the
MH17 crash, which threatens to erupt into nuclear war, but of provoking
the confrontation through the cold-blooded murder of 298 people aboard
MH17.
These
charges from Malaysia are all the more significant, in that Malaysia is
not a strategic adversary of the United States. Unlike Russia, which
already presented evidence suggesting Ukrainian involvement in the
crash, Malaysia has no political motive for trying to discredit the US,
the European powers, or their puppet regime in Kiev.
While
it has not aligned itself as openly as the Philippines or Vietnam with
the US “pivot to Asia” aimed at isolating China, Malaysia has in fact
pushed for deployments of its forces in the South China Sea to contest
Chinese influence in the area in line with the agenda of the US
“pivot.”
Indeed, the New Straits Times and
its sources are basing themselves on sections of US intelligence that,
disgruntled by the complete lack of evidence to back up U.S. charges
against Putin and fearing catastrophic military escalation, have
criticized Washington’s handling of the crisis (see: “Former US intelligence personnel challenge Obama to present evidence of Russian complicity in MH17 crash”).
These
events also constitute yet another indictment of the Western media, who
have completely blacked out the investigation of the crash of MH17 and
the latest material in the New Straits Times.
Instead, the elements in the CIA and their Ukrainian proxies driving
the war in east Ukraine have been able to escalate the confrontation
with Russia and demonize Putin, without any of their unsubstantiated
accusations of Russian involvement in the MH17 crash being challenged.
Kiev
regime officials are continuing to stonewall the investigation,
refusing Malaysian requests for information about MH17, such as the
record of communication between the doomed plane and air traffic
controllers in Kiev.
In an interview with the New Straits Times,
Ukrainian ambassador to Malaysia Ihor Humennyi denied reports that the
tapes had been seized by Ukraine’s State Security Service (SBU). “There
is no proof or evidence that the tapes were confiscated by the SBU. I
only read this in the newspapers,” he said.
When the New Straits Times asked
where the tapes were, Humennyi said he did not know. “We don’t have any
information that it had not been given to the investigation team, or
that it was not received by the [team of international] investigators,”
he said.
