With
every passing day, more information of bits and pieces come together
relating to the downing of the 777 in eastern Ukraine. And
with every passing day more people of the world are pointing their
fingers at Kiev for being GUILTY of this most gruesome slaughter of the
innocent people aboard the 777. The gangster "candy man drug lord" and gun runner who was recently elected President in Ukraine is lying through his teeth as to what really happened, along with his corrupt political assistants, the C.I.A., and the Jew Mossad of Israel who also are very involved in this 'False Flag Operation' with the political troublemakers now in control of the government in Ukraine. The present corrupt government in Kiev is where the world is now looking as being 100% responsible for all the deaths and destruction relating to the downed 777 in eastern Ukraine.
Dr. James P. Wickstrom
Seven Main Questions Relating To Downing Of the Malaysia 777 in Ukraine
1. For
unknown reasons, the flight diverted or was diverted from its usual
course to fly smack over a tiny patch of land---of roughly 5000 square
miles, or the size of Connecticut---controlled by pro-Russian rebels. In fact, the 777 went down a few miles from the geographic bottleneck
where three desperate Ukrainian brigades are trapped between the rebels
and the Russian border. Why? And if this airspace had been closed by
Ukraine (on July 8th), why was that closure never registered with
international aviation authorities or coordinating bodies?
2. Russian
media has quoted multiple Russian defense experts as saying that "Buk"
missiles are designed to explode within several hundred meters off a
target, sending between 50,000 and 100,000 pieces of shrapnel in all
directions at supersonic (maybe hypersonic) speeds. According to these
experts, an aircraft met by a "Buk" would be instantly riddled with
holes, and the wreckage would evidence that type of damage pattern.
However, the few large pieces of Malaysia 777 wreckage that we have seen
so far don't seem to fit the bill. In that case, was it really a "Buk",
or some other missile system? (And if the latter, is it even worth
arguing over whether the rebels have a "Buk"?) Or was the plane not
destroyed from the ground at all? Or was the flight shot down by one of the Ukraine jet fighters near it?
3. Related
to number (2), why were the Ukrainians so quick to say it was a "Buk"?
How would they know, within just minutes or an hour of the event?
Especially if both the alleged missile launch and the 777's coming down
to earth occurred on territory not under their control? And why did
they immediately (and wrongly) claim that 23 Americans were on board the
plane? Did they just make that up?
4. On
Friday, the Ukrainians claimed to have arrested two Russian officers
who had helped with targeting to bring down the 777. However, Kiev did
not announce their names, nor the location of their arrest, nor did it
provide any photographic or video evidence. So who are these people? Do
they even exist?
5. 23
minutes before the plane was first reported lost, the press secretary
for Ukraine's national security council announced that the rebels had
acquired a more potent air defense capability. Later that same day or
the next morning, Ukraine's chief prosecutor is reported to have said
that the rebels don't have any "Buks." What was all that about?
6. The
Russians claim that Ukraine recently moved an entire unit of "Buks"
into the Donetsk region. Ukraine has not denied that. Given the fluidity
of the front line which is changing almost every day, how can 'Uncle
Sam' be sure that the launch he claims to have observed did not come from
the Ukrainian side?
Moreover, if the U.S. "spooks" of N.S.A. have the capacity
to track
such an event from the sky, why can't they produce any satellite pics of
all the Russian military equipment coming over the border? Do they
really have a good eye on this area or not? And last but not least,
within a few hours of the plane being lost, there was already a claim in
the media (I think it was CNN) that U.S. spy assets saw evidence of a
missile being fired. How can information like that move so quickly
through the government and out to the press?
7. Finally,
on the purely domestic side, why has the U.S. media been referencing
airliner shoot-downs in 1983 and 1988, but maintaining total silence
about Siberian Airlines Flight 1812, which was downed by Ukraine in
2001? Wouldn't Flight 1812 be at least somewhat relevant to the
discussion? It's very strange that it hasn't come up.
