Dr. James P. Wickstrom
Mirror
July 31 2014
July 31 2014
Buried evidence proves fighter escort shoot down of MH17/370
The Dutch web site Anderweltonline managed to get a great photo of the actual part of the plane attacked, and it proves the fighter jet escorts shot Mh17/370 down.
They released a very clear photo in PDF form, which I have ripped to Jpeg and linked HERE. This opens 4,000 pixels wide, to make sure you view it full size for the details you need to see that indeed, the cockpit was shot at from both sides and then destroyed with a tank killing round.
Short explanation for now: If this was a missile shoot down:
1.
The cockpit would not have fragmented and landed far from the crash,
because missiles target the center mass which would be far enough away
from the cockpit to not significantly damage it.
2. All shrapnel punctures would be inward.
3. The cockpit would have likely remained intact.
What
happened here? There was crossfire targeting only the cockpit, the
cockpit of the plane was shot at from both sides which caused punctures
both inward and outward as proven by this piece of the aircraft. This
100 percent proves the fighter jets did it, and at least one explosive
round was used which blew the cockpit apart. The large body panel
sections were blown off the aircraft when the 550 plus MPH wind of
flight rammed itself straight into the gaping hole where the cockpit
was, which badly over pressured the aircraft. That is why there are so
many big pieces scattered across a distance. The plane would coast down
to the ground with no smoke trail if only the front of the plane was
targeted and explode on impact. THIS IS THE SCENARIO THAT ANSWERS ALL
QUESTIONS and it is proven true by just looking at this wreckage piece.
Click the picture below, though it appears large, it is nothing compared to the original which will come in if you click for it, and it is important because it is so clear it provides absolute proof this cockpit was in fact shot at with regular guns.
I was going to spend the morning translating the article on Anderwelt to Dutch, but when I hit that web site this morning, they had an English translation there already. For extra perspective, read it there
Excerpt:
"The
facts speak clear and loud and are beyond the realm of speculation: The
cockpit shows traces of shelling! You can see the entry and exit holes.
The edge of a portion of the holes is bent inwards. These are the
smaller holes, round and clean, showing the entry points most likeley
that of a 30 millimeter caliber projectile. The edge of the other, the
larger and slightly frayed exit holes showing shreds of metal pointing
produced by the same caliber projectiles. Moreover, it is evident that
at these exit holes of the outer layer of the double aluminum reinforced
structure are shredded or bent – outwardly! Furthermore, minor cuts can
be seen, all bent outward, which indicate that shrapnel had forcefully
exited through the outer skin from the inside of the cockpit. The open
rivets are are also bent outward.
In sifting through the available images one thing stands out: All wreckage of the sections behind the cockpit are largely intact, except for the fact that only fragments of the aircraft remained . Only the cockpit part shows these peculiar marks of destruction. This leaves the examiner with an important clue. This aircraft was not hit by a missile in the central portion."
And now my analysis:
IF
you were going to load dead bodies and dead pilots or no pilots onto an
aircraft and dead fly it, and then do a false flag with it, the best
rational method would be to destroy the cockpit, and there is a very good reason for this, which is:
The cockpit is the strongest part of the aircraft, and often remains intact after a crash. If you were going to false flag a plane down, you would not want an intact and empty cockpit, or an intact cockpit with pilots that had been "dead for days and smelling of decay" would you? Targeting the cockpit would be key to keeping a lid on a remote controlled flight that had no pilot interaction at all.
The fact the cockpit only was
targeted, once again confirms flight 370, because even if it was a 777
with a body identical to MH17, 15 years of technology advancement would
make the cockpit very different and THAT could not be permitted to show
up in any wreckage photos. Better to blow it completely to smithereens.
To ensure this, they used fighter jets to do the job rather than take a
random chance of a missile leaving obvious evidence that could end up on
Youtube.
And if they were not playing filthy with all of this, WHY BOTHER WITH A MISSILE STORY? Why say center mass was targeted, and produce cute graphics of a center hit? The public would have accepted targeting of the cockpit bringing the plane down, why would the perpetrators HAVE TO spawn a lie about a missile?
Summary of inconsistencies from the beginning of all this:
1. The bodies were rotting and dead for days on DAY ONE, no one living boarded the shot down plane.
2. The cockpit was targeted, had entry and exit holes proving guns took the plane down and a lie about a BUK missile was spawned, WHY?
3. In
all original photos, the flag on the plane matched flight 370, yet the
photos were all subsequently hacked to put all flags on all Malaysia
airlines planes in exactly the same position. After this, subsequent
photo hacks were done to show all kinds of different versions of the
same wreckage pieces, issued directly from Mainstream news sources which
allowed cross comparison to prove tampering and hard proof the
mainstream media was muddying the waters, and I would like to ask WHY?
Why not just show us the wreckage AS IT WAS?
4. Initially the
mainstream media reported 108 aids researchers were on the plane
"according to the boarding log" and then that same media was forced to
redact that and reduce the number to six, which is another lie because
IF A BOARDING LOG REALLY EXISTED, THE ORIGINAL 108 AIDS DOCTORS STORY
WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN REDACTED. Fact? ZERO aids doctors boarded the shot
down plane already dead for days and smelling of rot.
5. The shoot
down corresponded with the ground assault on Gaza within a provable time
frame of 10 minutes, and probably to the exact minute. This would be
lottery style luck if Israel did not order the shoot down or have the
Mossad set it all up to get double use out of the shoot down by having
it distract the news from dirty business elsewhere.
6. The flight was
200 KM off course and over a war zone for the first time EVER. Modern
avionics do not allow for such errors, even late 70's avionics would
not. HOW DID THAT ERROR HAPPEN other than willful intent and WHY? Well,
the frame up of Russia for all of this right when Russia was making a
big push for the BRICS alliance that threatened the dollar's reserve
status might give you a clue, a huge war on Russia would certainly cause
problems for that.
7. Flight 370 had to be gotten rid of, and people
disposed of, and it looks like the perpetrators of the shoot down
wanted NO WITNESSES so they made sure EVERYONE was smelling of rot to
make good and sure they were dead and would not survive any crash and
then speak about what happened to flight 370.
8. Media glitches
proved this was a psy op being prepared days in advance, which is why an
RC showed up in the wheel well of the plane "to show people what it
looked like if it crashed" when MH17 had an RD and flight 370 had an RO.
And the D on MH17 had a perfectly flat back, the C is a dead giveaway,
this was in the works for at least a week and probably longer, RC had
not flown for a week and was still on the ground in Malaysia after this
shoot down. How did a picture of it supposedly being boarded by a "crash
victim" end up in the news?
9. Route MH17 stayed PERFECTLY ON
SCHEDULE after this shoot down, yet route 370 was canceled for weeks.
How could this be, if flight MH17 really lost an aircraft to an
unexpected situation? This difference in behavior is fairly easy to
explain: Malaysia airlines was ambushed by the theft of flight 370, but
probably went along with the story about the shoot down of MH17 under
threat of blackmail, and since all questions were already answered they
had no reason to cancel the normal schedule for route MH17.
