OBAMACARE, AMNESTY, JUDGES, NSA, BLACKMAIL & COVER-UPS

An excellent article written by Devvy Kidd.  One that you will never forget as to the information she has presented.  In fact, I suggest you share it with as many people as you can, anywhere in the world.  Thank you.
Dr. James P. Wickstrom  

 

http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd639.htm

 

OBAMACARE, AMNESTY, JUDGES, NSA, BLACKMAIL & COVER-UPS

By: Devvy
June 1, 2014NewsWithViews.com

It is alleged Chief Justice John Roberts wrote both opinions for the decision for what's known as Obamacare or the false official title: Affordable Care Act: How Roberts Was Blackmailed To Support ObamaCare. That particular piece covers the likely illegal adoption of two infants, a boy and a girl by Roberts and his wife from Ireland in 2000. (Marriage is always a good cover) Under Ireland's adoption laws, it appears Roberts' and his wife ran afoul of the law. Roberts was confirmed to the high court, September 29, 2005.

Then, there are those who believe John Roberts, a strict Catholic is a closet sexual deviant. According to two people I know who work in downtown DC in the legal field, Roberts' sexual preference has been the talk all over town since he became Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. In the mid-90s while my husband and I lived in Colorado, there was a huge war over a constitutional amendment pertaining to sexual deviants:

"Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S. 620 (1996), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case dealing with sexual orientation and state laws. It was the first Supreme Court case to address gay rights since Bowers v. Hardwick (1986), when the Court had held that laws criminalizing sodomy were constitutional.

"The Court ruled in a 6-3 decision that a state constitutional amendment in Colorado preventing protected status based upon homosexuality or bisexuality did not satisfy the Equal Protection Clause. The majority opinion in Romer stated that the amendment lacked "a rational relationship to legitimate state interests", and the dissent stated that the majority "evidently agrees that 'rational basis' - the normal test for compliance with the Equal Protection Clause - is the governing standard". The state constitutional amendment failed rational basis review."

As Wikipedia so aptly put it: "The decision in Romer set the stage for Lawrence v. Texas (2003), where the Court overruled its decision in Bowers, and for the Supreme Court ruling striking down Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. Windsor (2013)." Stage is an accurate word because Lawrence v Texas was deliberately staged:

"The Lawrence case was a set up to catch two males engaging in sodomy to test the courts and it worked. Even though Sandra Day O'Connor didn't deny sodomy is a chosen sexual practice, the "high court" ruled against states rights, decency and mankind. In other words, it doesn't matter if sodomy is a chosen behavior, that's okay. Equal protection under the law and soon will come protection for pedophiles and every other sexual deviancy known on this earth."

Editorial note: Go to the website and read the rest of this.