I am still amazed that for all the fluff and talking in Washington, D.C. that NO ONE IS ASKING THE QUESTION: Who told the military to "Stand down" ... which in turn allowed the 4 Americans to DIE!!
Is there a problem here? I would say...YES!! Who and in what position
would not allow anyone to rescue the 4 Americans that were killed.
Enjoy the information below, you won't hear or see it on the U.S. Jew
controlled national news outlets. But then again, that is what Jewish
communism is all about ... to keep the masses STUPID and NON or
MIS-INFORMED.
Dr. James P. Wickstrom
CANADAFREEPRESS.COM
Administration is engaged in a massive cover-up
Benghazi explained: Interview with an “Intelligence Insider”
- Doug Hagmann (Bio and Archives) Thursday, November 29, 2012 (37) Comments | Print friendly | Subscribe | Email Us |
This is part one of a multi-part interview with a government insider
intimately familiar with the events that took place in Benghazi. In this
part, he provides important background, and explains this
administration is engaged in a massive cover-up.
|
DH: It’s been a while since we’ve discussed Benghazi. What have you heard lately?
II: Before I answer that, I want to get a few things off my chest.
Every politician, whether it’s a congressman senator, diplomat, or their
spokespeople and the media are lying to the American public
every time they call the location of the attack a consulate. It was not.
There was absolutely no diplomatic consulate in Benghazi. None. Words
are important here. They can create a wrong image, an incorrect picture
of what was really going on. The property where our Ambassador and other
Americans were murdered was a rented villa consisting of a primary
residence with a couple of outbuildings behind the actual house. The
reason they’re still calling it a consulate is to subtly divert any
questions about our activities there.
DH: Let’s go over this again; exactly what was taking place at Benghazi?
II:
As I said, the place where the attack happened is one of the largest,
one of the most active CIA operation centers in North Africa, if not in
the entire Middle East. It was not a diplomatic station. It was a
planning and operations center, a logistics hub for weapons and arms
being funneled out of Libya. Unlike the embassy in Tripoli, there was
limited security in Benghazi. Why? So the operation did not draw
attention to what was going on there.
DH: So in reality there were no actual security issues?
II: Oh yes, there were, in Tripoli. Diplomatic cables show that. But
it was for the embassy in Tripoli, the Ambassador and the diplomatic
staff in general, not specifically for the Benghazi location for two
reasons. First, the Benghazi location was a CIA operation, not a
diplomatic one. Visible security at that location would draw unwanted
attention there. They had to blend in. Remember, the villa was located
in a somewhat residential area, sort of like the suburbs. Secondly,
additional manpower was not needed there, at this CIA center, as the
operation was already winding down.
DH: I know you’ve gone over this before, but let’s get into the specifics of the operation at Benghazi.
II: Good, I want to be clear. After Gaddafi was taken out, there was
the matter of his weapons and arms that were hidden all over Libya,
including chemical weapons - gas weapons. According to Obama and Hillary
Clinton, we were in Libya to collect and destroy these weapons to make
for a ‘safer’ Libya. That’s what they were telling the American public.
That’s not really what was going on, though, and it seems like all of
the other nations except the average American knew it. Anyway, you can
find pictures and videos of weapons caches being destroyed, but that is
strictly for the public’s consumption.
What was really happening, before Gaddafi’s body was even cold, is
that we had people locating caches of weapons, separating the working
from those that weren’t, and making a big show of destroying the
weapons, but only the weapons that were useless. The working weapons
were being given to Islamic terrorists. They were being funneled through
Libya, crisscrossing Libya on a Muslim Brotherhood managed strategic
supply route. In fact, Michael Reagan called it the modern day
equivalent of the Ho Chi Minh Trail in a recent article he wrote, and he is correct.
The entire arms and weapons running operation was headquartered in
Benghazi, The weapons were actually being shipped out of Libya from the
port city of Dernah, located about a hundred miles east of Benghazi.
That was the ‘choke point’ of the weapons being shipped out. Remember
the Lusitania? Think in those terms, ships carrying weapons hid among
‘humanitarian aid.’ By the time of the attacks, an estimated 30-40
million pounds of arms were already transported out of Libya.
From there, the weapons were being sent to staging areas in Turkey
near the Syrian border, for use by the Free Syrian Army and other ragtag
terrorist groups to fight against Assad. The objective was and still is
to destabilize the Assad government.
Why Syria, why not Iran?
II: It’s both, but Syria is the primary target here for this
operation. First, look at the bigger picture, look at the so-called
“Arab Spring.” Who benefits and by default, who doesn’t? Who is the
architect for what’s going on throughout the Middle East and North
Africa? Whose agenda is being implemented? To specifically address
Benghazi, though, look at the bigger picture here and what is trying to
be accomplished.
The Obama administration is playing the role of Saudi Arabia’s
private army. I think if Americans knew this, they would be outraged.
Our service men and women are being sold out as mercenaries for the
wants and desires of the Royal family, for the Saudi’s interests. It’s
about religious dominance and oil. Who is really benefitting from, say,
what’s going on in Egypt? Mubarek is out, and the Muslim Brotherhood is
in. Who does that benefit? Saudi Arabia.
Look at what we see happening in Egypt. Destabilization. Do you think
the Russians want that? Hell no. Syria is Russia’s red line in the
sand, as you earlier wrote. If Syria is lost to the Muslim Brotherhood
by the actions of Obama, Hillary Clinton and others in this
administration, what happens? Well, it will have an adverse impact on
Russia from a military standpoint. They will likely lose access to their
Mediterranean deep water port in Syria, which is Tartus.
But think further - three dimensionally. Russia is still the world’s
largest oil producer, and that’s Russia’s primary source of income. Then
there’s Turkey, adjacent to Syria. A large amount of Russian oil and
gas, consumed by the West, flows through Turkey, which is also a player
in this operation.
So, the destabilization of Syria which is exactly what Obama and
Clinton are trying to do, presents a direct military and economic threat
to Russia. Assad at least has kept things in check in Syria. Can you
imagine Assad being replaced by someone like Morsi? That would strike at
the very heart of Russia’s economic health and military capabilities.
Think of what’s at stake here. Do Americans want a regional war? World
War III? Has Obama or Clinton asked the American people if this is what
they want?
Make no mistake, we are doing the bidding for Saudi Arabia. The U.S.,
NATO and other allies are engaged in a proxy war with Iran and Russia.
What about Assad’s war crimes?
Assad is no angel, but don’t be fooled by the death toll attributed
to him. Now this is important. Remember the first Gulf War? In the run
up to Desert Storm, a young woman testified before the Human Rights
Caucus - she only testified under her first name, which was Nayirah.
Remember that she testified that Iraqi soldiers were taking infants from
incubators in Kuwait, leaving them to die? Her testimony was supposedly
confirmed by Amnesty International. Her testimony went viral, and every
war hawk in the U.S. government cited her testimony, saying we needed
to right the wrongs, the inhumanity. It was all one big lie!
After Desert Storm, it was revealed that Nayirah’s last name was
Al-Sabah, and she was the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador to the
United States. Her testimony was part of a publicity campaign organized
by Citizens for a Free Kuwait, which was run by Hill & Knowlton, a
PR firm out of New York. People must learn the back story.
So we see a body count attributed to Assad. Who’s doing the killing,
Assad’s people? Maybe at times, but the Free Syrian Army and other
groups are doing most of the slaughter. It’s one huge ‘false flag’
operation and the media is selling it hard. And Americans are buying it,
just like the testimony of the girl from Kuwait.
It’s one big lie being told by Obama, Clinton, Rice, and others. Many
Americans are buying the lie, and the media is selling the lie. The
people behind this are laughing at us. Don’t you get it? They’re
laughing at us.
And do you want to know what’s at stake? Four Americans were killed
in Benghazi. Forty thousand have been killed so far in Syria. Tens of
thousands of Syrian people have become refugees. Why? For what? To
advance the agenda of Saudi Arabia. For oil.
You know, the so-called right wing establishment were all up in arms
about Obama’s submissive bow to the Saudi King. Where are they now?
Where’s the outrage that the body count will be much greater than Forty
thousand? It is anticipated that if the Obama plan succeeds, not only
will America be committed to yet another war, but the body count could
be as high as FOUR MILLION. Christians, among others, will be slaughtered. This could trigger a third world war, it’s that serious.
What are Russia and Iran doing? Certainly, they must be fighting back.
Benghazi was a strike against us, the Obama-Clinton agenda. A visible
strike, and I’ll explain more about this shortly, because there are
events I will point out that will put it all into perspective. But think
of it this way. How did we successfully collapse the Soviet Union? I
mean, what was the last straw? We attacked their currency - the Ruble.
They’re still stinging from that, and Putin was in the KGB at the time.
Do you think he forgot about that?
So, how do, or will Russia and Iran strike back if Obama and
Clinton continue this insanity? Militarily? Possibly in regional
conflicts, but to take us out, to stop us, what is the one area where we
are very vulnerable? It’s our economy - our dollar. What’s our dollar
tied to? Not gold or silver anymore, and some say it’s not tied to
anything. Well, that’s not quite correct. It’s tied to OIL. The
free-flow of oil.
Oil transactions everywhere in the world, including Russia and China,
are made with U.S. dollars. We buy their oil with our dollars, and they
return with those same paper dollars and employ Americans by buying our
goods and services. As Michael Reagan wrote:
“[t]his system is also crucial to the security of our diplomatic and
legal infrastructure, which is ultimately backed by our military. It’s
the core of our foreign policy.”
He also wrote that -
“any attack on the
free flow of oil is an attack on the dollar. Any attack on the dollar is
an attack on our ability to project power and protect Western
democracies, economies, and ideals. God have mercy on us all if that
attack is successful!”
Tomorrow Part II
Copyright © Douglas Hagmann
Douglas J. Hagmann and his son, Joe Hagmann host The Hagmann & Hagmann Report, a live Internet radio program broadcast each weeknight from 8:00-10:00 p.m. ET.
Douglas Hagmann, founder & director of the Northeast Intelligence Network,
and a multi-state licensed private investigative agency. Doug began
using his investigative skills and training to fight terrorism and
increase public awareness through his website.
Doug can be reached at: director@homelandsecurityus.com
|